Lisa, the Simpson!
December 04, 2008, 19:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 Add Site
 
   Home   Galleries Library Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3  All
  Print  
Author Topic: The Simpsons Movie Reviews  (Read 4477 times)
SpringfieldHorror
LisaCon Founder & President
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 288


« on: July 30, 2007, 20:08 »

Most of you have seen the movie, yes? Some, like me, have yet to see it.
There was a big reveiw in the local paper along with 19 reasons why The Simpsons is the best thing that happened to pop culture.
Brace yourself for some spoilers. If you're not intrested in them, simply skip it and just head to the ending.  Smile

"At this stage in American pop culture, the question is not" Why a "Simpsons" movie? But instead: What in the name of Apu Nahasapeemapetilon took so long?

There are laughs and pleasures to be had throughout "The Simpsons Movie"- but they are familiar laughs and familiart pleasures. And while familiarity is a key to success on television, a medium in which people esentially invite their favorite characters into their homes, it is often death in a movie theater, an enviornment in which we seek escape and sensation rather than homey tradition.

After nearly two decades, Portland native Matt Groening's dysfunctional yellow family and their fellow inhabitants of fictional, fractures Springfield are still funny folks, make no mistake. But they can no longer suprise and delight in quite the fashion they did in those halcyon years when bootleg Bart Simpson T-shirts were the rage and class and office clowns sounded subversive when they blurted out "D'oh!" after committing or witnessing an error.
Well, for whatever reason of business or art that delayed it, "The Simpsons Movie" arrives with less anticipation that might have greeted it 15 years ago - which both works for the film and against it. On the one hand, the hype attendant on its debut is less heated (if no less ubiquitous.)  On the other hand, the franchise has acqured a stale air that the film must shake off if it's to rescue the Simpsons' bygone glow of shock and glory.

Given all the complications, it's gratifying that "The Simpsons Movie" is a legitimately entertaining film. It never truly sparkles or shines, but it barely ever plods or frustrates. The filmmakers have taken the effort to work out a full length plot and give virtually every major character a cameo at the very least, while including the sorts of suprising celebrity apperances the series is known for (Albert Brooks, Tom Hanks, and the members of Green Day do the duites). But at the same time, the film feels like a long and not particularly distinguished episode of a series the best half-hours of which can still make you pass a beverage- if not a snack- through your nose.

The film opens with a flattish prologue that finds the Simpsons at a movie house watching an Itchy and Scratchy film. Homer complains that he can see this sort of stuff on TV for free: a dangerous joke the tinge of which the film never quite erases.

A typically knotty narrative begins: Pollution at Lake Springfield has reached dangerous levels, and Homer inadvertently turns the situation from meerly dire to genuinely life-threatening; the federal government (under the leadership of President Schwarzenegger, motto:"I was elected to lead, not to read") takes drastic measures to quarantine the city; when the citizens of Springfield learn that Homer is responible for their situation, the Simpsons flee for their lives. Meanwhile, Bart has his eyes turned by the fatherly ways of Ned Flanders, and Lisa meets a boy who shares her intrests in music an liberal politics. And the government's plans for Springfield become increasingly draconian.

The film more or less provides the sorts of things we expect from a Simpsons episode: Homer's gluttony and stupidity, Merge's sense of conscience and loyalty to her idiot husband, Bart's blend of defiance and insecurity, Lisa's alturism, Grampa Abe's senility, the lust of Milhouse, the greed of Mr. Burns, the fatuous newscasts, the dim-wit cops, and so on.

The writers have struggled mightily to provide a close-up, if not a line for every recurring character in the history of the show, which turns out not to be a good thing nessicarily, underscoring, as it does, the slight token use to which so many of them are put. Equally, none of the new characters - the evil Enviornmental Protection Agency chief, Lisa's new beau, an Inuit medicine woman- manages to create a distinguished impression.

Still, the film has delights: a scene of domestic bliss between Homer and Marge and the "Snow White"-esque denziens of an Alaskan forest; little jabs at Disney and Fox; allusions to movies and "Simpsons" episodes; Hanks' smug self-parody; some genuinely funny sight gags and witty jokes. And it moves with grace and speed.

So it satisfies- but no more. As I say in terms of the attention span of popular culture, "The Simpsons Movie" arrives eons after hat should have been it moment, and who can say what form it would have taken had it been created and released in a more timely fashion. At this time and in this form, it's amusing enough and breezy enough not to dissapoint. But it never dazzles or chalenges or truly delights. And that leaves me fairly certain that whatever Bart Simpson would say about it probably couldn't be printed in a family newspaper."


Overall Grade: B
The Lowdown: Admiable but not special; like a long and only pretty good TV episode.
Run Time: 78 minutes.
Rated: PG-13
-SHAWN LEVY
(© July 27, 2007, The Oregonian)

Logged

Crowded classrooms and half-day sessions are a tragic waste of our greatest national resource - the minds of our children.
-Walt Disney
Black_raven
Why so SERIOUS?....
Simpsons Team
*
Online Online

Gender: Female
Posts: 654

STAAR POWAAH!
WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2007, 21:16 »

*just wants to contribute*
I have just seen the movie today but won't add any spoilers anyway, most been said there Tongue
I personally loved the film, and I believe this is down to me not expecting that much from it. Not saying its perfect, or the best film ever, but overall I found it very good Smile
The animation was, really beautiful, it wasn't flat or dull, it was colourful and had a lot of depth..
Although most reviews don't agree with this, I felt the characters, especially Bart, were given more depth, and seemed more human.
The Itchy and Scratchy episode didn't disappoint Tongue
I didn't find the movie was ruined by the guest stars in any way as they weren't given the spot light like in many of the recent episodes today

I found it more like the older episodes in the sense of the plot and I didn't feel like there were gags after gags being forced onto the audience either...there's only a few gags I didn't find funny however these were usually the ones from the previews/trailers...such as the Homer and the hammer scene which I'm sure everyones seen by now... The cinema roared with laughter at that scene...I was probably the only one who didnt O_o... (however the cinema was full of little kids today... taken along by parents who think that since its a cartoon movie therefore suitable for 3 year olds...but I won't get into that rant >_<)

Overall, I feel it was a good movie and I was impressed ^_^
Logged

*~Rise and Fall~Rage and Grace~*
SimpReal
Mood Swinger
Administrator
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1399

Solving the Equation
WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2007, 23:13 »

* SimpReal has to wait for 28 September to see it in Italy... >_<  *swears deleted*
Logged

Did he open up his eyes?
Did he try to touch my hand,
Or is my mind playing tricks on me?
Do you think he hears us cry?
Does he understand
We are here, by his side...
Miles
Shutterbug
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 313


« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2007, 15:15 »

*Spoilers*
Heh, I went to see the movie a couple of days ago, I'm not gonna make a full review, but I'll share some of my thoughts.

The most recent season(s) of the Simpsons have drastically changed, both in the sense of storylines and gags, if anyone has seen season 18.
The gags in the movie are a mixture of the old fashioned Simpson jokes and the recent, more crude ones. Some of them remind me of Family Guy, those have always been a bit insane.
I loved the opening Itch & Scratchy episode on the big screen, being the first thing I saw, I couldn't help but chuckle when the movie started, and when all those warheads came flying... LOL!
My opinion on the storyline is pretty much the same, it's not quite always what it used to be, but it's certainly not crude. Maybe a little cliché at times, like Marge leaving Homer, but I found the scene to be alot stronger than the usual ones. Meh, maybe that's just me.
The visuals were all rich and pretty, even though it's not in a typical "Simpsons spirit", at times it gave me that overwhelming feeling I always get at the movies, so it was certainly a welcome effort.

So to sum it up, I think it was a pretty damn good movie. They left a spot for the good old Simpsons feeling while combining it with new elements, and it works for me! Even if the latter feels a little different Wink
I love the Lisa scenes (had to mention lol), but I wouldn't mind seeing her just a bit more.
Oh, and one thing is for sure. You need to go see it on the big screen, it's just visually and at times audibly more intense that way.
Preferrably with a friend though :P  I don't laugh at stuff unless it's really, really funny when I see a movie by myself. Don't know if anyone here goes to the movies alone, but I know some people do Confused
Logged

Take control... take control damn you!
Black_raven
Why so SERIOUS?....
Simpsons Team
*
Online Online

Gender: Female
Posts: 654

STAAR POWAAH!
WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2007, 19:41 »

SimpReal has to wait for 28 September to see it in Italy
What?..woah O_o, sorry to hear that,..wonder why you have to wait so long though? Thought it was out in most of Europe earlier than that  Confused
Logged

*~Rise and Fall~Rage and Grace~*
SpringfieldHorror
LisaCon Founder & President
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 288


« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2007, 19:43 »

Thanks for your summary, Kasper. ^_^
It sounds like something to behold to know how it relly goes.
It's a shame that Lisa isn't as actve as regularly, though.
I'll be seeing it Saturday, since I'll be spending my day at the theater.
Smile

SimpReal
I'm sorry! I thought it would have made the 27th release like alot of other countries. D:
That's... a long time to wait though. o__o;
Logged

Crowded classrooms and half-day sessions are a tragic waste of our greatest national resource - the minds of our children.
-Walt Disney
SpringfieldHorror
LisaCon Founder & President
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 288


« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2007, 20:43 »

I've finally got to see it on Saturday.
It wasn't what I had expected it to be. I don't know if it was the person who kept talking really loud in the front of the room, or if it was the parents who brought their young children to a film that is fit for teenagers. Confused

Don't get me wrong, the animation and colours were great, and everything seemed to fit, but it felt a little lax. Almost cliché at moments, as Kasper has suggested.

Some of the parts for the trailers and some of the voice actors never appeared. Maile Flanagan (voice of Uzumaki Naruto in English dub) was supposed to play Colin, and Erin Brokavitch was never there. Confused
I did like Green Day's cameos, though. ^^

I guess it was just me at that day, everyone else seemed to have enjoyed it alot.
Logged

Crowded classrooms and half-day sessions are a tragic waste of our greatest national resource - the minds of our children.
-Walt Disney
Casper
Sugarcube
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 702

A world without string...?! Is CHAOS!!

« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2007, 01:25 »

 Not sure whether this will work or not. But, worth a try.
A link toThe Simpsons Movie an Elephant in a bath, for those who wish to see.

I'd rather wait however. Rach did mention going to the cinema next time we met up to watch [An Elephant in a bath] together so, I'll wait for then. Smile



The movie has broke. Missed your chance! Tongue
Logged

Simpson-Realities
Dedicated to Realities

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter and those who matter don’t mind”
-Dr. Seuss.
G.H.
Mr. Pink Floyd
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1608

WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2007, 00:29 »

Well I have just returned from seeing the movie, finally... and since it appears we have several topics about this subject matter, I'll just pick this one to post my own little review in. Smile

**WARNING: If you have not seen the movie yet, you may want to skip reading this review... I am not going to make any extra-special efforts to not spoil anything, so unless you don't care about finding out a few things, then it is in your best interest to wait until you have seen the movie before you read this.**

Well, let me start off by saying I've come not to expect much from any new Simpsons episodes, and the movie was no different. However, due to my low expectations, it didn't really disappoint me either. It was exactly what I had expected it to be; a long episode. Nothing truly special at all about it. Some moments made me laugh genuinely, but other parts were just plain awkward; the inclusion of full-frontal nudity was stupid and unnecessary. And Lord knows, I'm not one for censorship, and that's not why I thought it was stupid - I just thought that giving Bart all of these random objects to cover his genitals, be it bubbles, butterflies, plants, or what, only to reveal them in the end, left me scratching my head. It was just so... pointless.

Another thing that disappointed me was the lack of side characters, or their participation at least. We saw hardly anything from Apu, or Dr. Hibbert; and Mr. Burns and Smithers, two of my favorite characters, had barely any lines. And were Principal Skinner or Groundskeeper Willie even in the movie? I couldn't tell.

The characterization of Lisa was extremely disappointing as well. Now, I enjoy the character of Lisa, but the way they portrayed her in the movie though was just awful. First of all, she was overly-liberal in her efforts to save the lake. I share her concerns about the environment, but in the movie they completely overdid it. And then when she meets Colin, her character becomes an awkward, stumbling, lovesick moron most of the time. Bad, bad, bad.

It did have its good moments, though; the inclusion of Tom Hanks, one of my favorite actors, was a nice surprise and made me laugh pretty hard - "Isn't it nice to have a government you can trust?" Big Grin And the bomb-disabling robot that committed "suicide", was pretty funny as well... although I still felt that most of the humor in the movie was lacking, as it has been since the early days. One of the funniest moments I can remember from the old show is from the 9th season, when Apu lives with the Simpsons in an attempt to convince his mother that he's Marge's husband (The Two Mrs. Nehasapimapetilons) - the moment is when Homer goes to Moe's and discovers that Moe is leaving on vacation. "I'm finally gonna see Easter Island", he tells Homer. Homer responds with, "Ah yeah, going to see the giant heads huh?" And then Moe's face goes absolutely deadpan and he says "With the, what now?" They just didn't have any of the real Simpsons humor in this movie... some of the humor that's been lacking for many seasons now.

Overall, the movie wasn't a disappointment, but definitely will never be considered one of my favorite movies of all time.

My rating: 5/10
Logged
Dagdamor
Lisahugger
Administrator
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2564

WWW
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2007, 03:48 »

GeorgeHarrison
About that bushes moment - I think it was just a parody to the whole censorship stuff. Seems that Groening dislikes it as much as Gary does Wink I think so because it was obviously an intended joke, not just something randomly funny. Plants cannot grow like that (i.e. part above, part below), and the slit in the bushes was looking exactly like that black rectangle the censorship usually uses for covering questionable stuff. Wink That wasn't the moment that bugged me - but the right next moment, when Ralph said what he said, was. That was really stupid and unnecessary. Mad The movie wouldn't lose much if they dropped that moment.

But that was nearly the only thing I didn't like in the movie. Still have to write my bit.
Logged

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace. - Jimi Hendrix
G.H.
Mr. Pink Floyd
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1608

WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2007, 05:06 »

Dagdamor
You mean "I like men now"? Yeah that was a little weird and out of the blue. It didn't really bug me though, I just thought it was a little random. I still don't think that the whole nudity thing was really necessary, though. Just seemed...  I dunno, pointless. And cartoon nudity is well... disturbing.
Logged
brakusaetsya
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 554

I'm special!

« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2007, 08:10 »

GeorgeHarrison
I just thought that giving Bart all of these random objects to cover his genitals, be it bubbles, butterflies, plants, or what, only to reveal them in the end, left me scratching my head
Me too Smile I agree that it was just joke about censorship, but these attempts to cover him there with different objects were more funny to me than his uncovering. At least, they can make that slit shorter Smile

As for Lisa - yep, she has not so deep character as in episodes, but due to they can't fit all details of characters in one plot, it was normal, as lack of supporting personages (although I wanted to see more of them, too). For girl in love she acted naturally, with Luke and Jesse she was almost the same. As for her activism - why you think they overdid it? She only went to people houses and than said her speech to citizens, that's all. Nothing bad I can see.
Logged

Me fail english? That's unpossible! Wink
G.H.
Mr. Pink Floyd
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1608

WWW
« Reply #12 on: August 18, 2007, 08:23 »

brakusaetsya
Yeah, she said her speech and campaigned for the environment and such, and then when she meets Colin and they start rattling off these facts about environmental safety measures...? Uhhh... and of course there's the moment when she snaps her clipboard in half because of her anger at the pollution. I don't know, I just got the impression that she was really laying it on too thick.
Logged
brakusaetsya
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 554

I'm special!

« Reply #13 on: August 18, 2007, 08:41 »

GeorgeHarrison
and then when she meets Colin and they start rattling off these facts about environmental safety measures...?
Heh, somehow she had to recognize, that he is pure gold for her Tongue How they could fall in love without realizing, how much they have in common? Tongue If there was another plot, music or they fondness of learning could be the main reason, but in case of lake pollution only that way was possible to show, that they are incredibly match each other.
Logged

Me fail english? That's unpossible! Wink
G.H.
Mr. Pink Floyd
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1608

WWW
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2007, 08:45 »

brakusaetsya
Well, regardless of WHY it was included, I still think that they went a bit overboard. I mean, it was just the whole feeling I got... in some episodes they capitalize on her liberal-ness, in others, not so much... this was simply one where they did. I don't really like it when they focus on this - it makes it seem like she's just an annoying, nagging little activist who will never be satisfied. If you want to change the world, there are other ways.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1 RC3 | SMF © 2001-2006, Lewis Media